Ohio Circuit Courts, 1909

Loeb v. Kent

Loeb v. Kent
Ohio Circuit Courts · Decided June 15, 1909 · Giffen, Smith, Swing
21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 520

Counsel

Bates & Meyer, for plaintiff in error., Klein & Stagman and J. R. Jordan, for defendant in error.

Loeb v. Kent

Opinion of the Court

SWING, J.

No transcript of the final record or transcript of the docket or journal entries in this ease was filed in this’court until long after the four months from the rendition of the judgment complained of, and not for more than four months after the petition in error had been filed. This court therefore has acquired no jurisdiction to hear and determine whether the judgment is correct or not. Second Nat. Bank v. Moderwell, 59 Ohio St. 221 [52 N. E. Rep. 194]; Falconer v. Martin, 66 Ohio St. 352, 356 [64 N. E. Rep. 430].

The action in this court should be dismissed.

Giffen and Smith, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.