Ohio Circuit Courts, 1909

Scheinesohn v. Lemonek

Scheinesohn v. Lemonek
Ohio Circuit Courts · Decided July 3, 1909 · Giffen, Smith, Swing
22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 727

Counsel

Hoffman, Bode & LeBlond, for plaintiff in error:, Frank Seinsheimer, for defendant in error:

Scheinesohn v. Lemonek

Opinion of the Court

SMITH, J.

The record does not show that the charge complained of was all that was said to the jury by the court upon the subject in litigation. For aught that appears the errors claimed to exist may have been corrected.

However; the court is of the opinion that in the charge, in its entirety, there is nothing prejudicial to plaintiff in error and the judgment is affirmed.

Giffen and Swing, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.