Cuyahoga Circuit Court, 1888

Krum v. Stoll

Krum v. Stoll
Cuyahoga Circuit Court · Decided July 1, 1888
2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 287

Counsel

J. H. Hardy and C. L. Fish, for plaintiff., Willson & Sykora and Hessenmueller & Gallup, for defendant.

Krum v. Stoll

Opinion of the Court

Where a new trial is sought on the ground of newly discovered evidence, that evidence should not be cumulative. Jones v. Voorhees, 10 O., 147; W., 548; Stevens v. Hey, 15 O., 313; 1 D., 115; Loeffner v. State, 10 O. S., 598.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.