Wood v. Searles
Opinion of the Court
The parties to this proceeding in error stand in the relation opposite to that in which they stood in the original action. That was an action for rent of a house which the tenant had vacated during the term because of its becoming untenantable from the bad condition of the plumbing and sewer connection. The lease contained a printed clause, in language similar to that of Sec. 4113 R. S. (Sec. 8521 G-. C.), providing that the tenant should not be liable for rent after surrender of the premises in case they should without his fault be injured or destroyed by the elements or other cause so as to become unfit for occupancy. At the close of all the evidence the court below directed a verdict for the landlord, upon the ground that neither the statute nor the clause in the lease contemplated a condition resulting merely from natural wear and decay as in this case. We do not find it necessary to pass upon that precise question, because it
For a like reason the court’s exclusion of evidence of an alleged custom in Cleveland requiring landlords to make such repairs could not possibly be prejudicial. The circumstances surrounding the negotiations of the lease show clearly that the contract of the parties and the reservation of the stipulated rental were agreed upon by taking into consideration the existing condition of the premises without reference to any repairs.
The judgment below is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.