Cuyahoga Circuit Court, 1908

State Banking & Trust Co. v. Krause

State Banking & Trust Co. v. Krause
Cuyahoga Circuit Court · Decided October 26, 1908 · Henry, Marvin, Winch
26 Ohio C.C. Dec. 538; 16 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 273; 1908 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 323

Counsel

Smith, Taft & Arter, for plaintiff in error., Carpenter, Young & Stocker, Kline Tolies & Goff and Smith, Taft & Arter, for defendant in error.

State Banking & Trust Co. v. Krause

Opinion of the Court

WINCH, J.

Motion is made in this case by B. D. Nicola, one of the defendants, to strike the bill of exceptions from t-he files because the clerk failed to notify him of the filing of said bill, as required by Sec. 5301 R. S.

He suggests that perhaps he might have corrected the bill if it had been submitted to him, but he fails to point out any particulars in which the bill is wrong, or show any prejudice which might arise to his rights from a use of the bill in the case.

Motion overruled on authority of Davies v. Railway, 71 Ohio St., 325 [73 N. E. 213].

Marvin and Henry, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.