Thompson v. Rosenberg
Opinion of the Court
Thompson brought his action on an attested account, praying for a personal judgment against the defendant, James Rosen
It appears that the defendant, Katz, purchased said premises of Rosenberg; no personal judgment was asked against him.
The judgment being in favor of Thompson and against Eosenberg and Katz, the latter appealed the case to this court, where he is met by a motion to dismiss his appeal on the ground that the case is not appealable.
Motion overruled on authority of the ease of Fleming v. Kirkendall, 31 Ohio St. 568.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.