Hoffman v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Hoffman v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ROBERT A. HOFFMAN, ) CASE NO. 1:18 CV 2123 ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE DAN AARON POLSTER ) vs. ) OPINION AND ORDER ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ) ) Defendant. ) Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp II (R & R). Doc #: 15. Magistrate Judge Knepp recommends that the Court reverse the Commissioner’s decision to deny Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) to Plaintiff Robert A. Hoffman, and to remand the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the R & R. Id. Under the relevant statute, Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1). The failure to timely file written objections to a Magistrate Judge’s R & R constitutes a waiver of the right to obtain a de novo review of the R & R in the district court. United States v. Walters,

638 F.2d 947

, 949–50 (6th Cir. 1981); Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140

, 149–50 (1985). The failure to file written objections also results in a waiver of the right to appeal. Thomas v. Arn,

728 F.2d 813

(6th Cir. 1984), aff’d,

474 U.S. 140

(1985). Here, the R & R was filed on July 24, 2019, and the deadline for filing objections was Wednesday, August 7, 2019. It is now August 9, 2019, and the Commissioner has neither filed objections nor requested an extension of time to do so. The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s thorough, 20-page R & R concluding that

the ALJ’s analysis of Listing 1.04, and of Dr. Louis Keppler’s medical source opinion, is not supported by substantial evidence and recommends that the decision be reversed and remanded. The undersigned firmly agrees. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R & R in its entirety, REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision denying DIB to Robert Hoffman, and REMANDS the case for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of

42 U.S.C. § 405

(g). IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Dan A. Polster August 9, 2019 Dan Aaron Polster United States District Judge

-2-

Reference

Status
Unknown