District Court, S.D. Ohio, 2019

Oppenheimer v. City of Madeira, Ohio

Oppenheimer v. City of Madeira, Ohio
District Court, S.D. Ohio · Decided October 9, 2019
Oppenheimer v. City of Madeira, Ohio

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Doug Oppenheimer, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:19cv770 City of Madeira, Ohio, Defendant.

ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on September 24, 2019 (Doc. 9).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 9) have been filed.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 9) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 5) is DENIED as MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.