Brunner v. Bell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Nathaniel Brunner, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:19cv575 Captain H. Bell, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett Defendants.

ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on September 23, 2019 (Doc. 7).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 7) have been filed.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 7) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, the Complaint if dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1), with the exception of plaintiff’s First Amendment claim against defendant Bell.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court