Sales v. I Supply Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Sales v. I Supply Co.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

SHIRLETTA SALES,

Plaintiff, Case No. 3:18-cv-158

vs.

I SUPPLY COMPANY, et al., Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Consent Case) Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) DISMISSING THIS CASE WITH PREJUDICE; AND (2) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE COURT’S DOCKET ______________________________________________________________________________

The Court, having been advised that the above-captioned matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to all parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Within sixty (60) days, the parties may move to substitute this Order and Entry with a proposed dismissal entry agreed upon by the parties. Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am.,

511 U.S. 375, 381-82

(1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement, if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: October 18, 2019 s/ Michael J. Newman Michael J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown