Sales v. I Supply Co.
Sales v. I Supply Co.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
SHIRLETTA SALES,
Plaintiff, Case No. 3:18-cv-158
vs.
I SUPPLY COMPANY, et al., Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Consent Case) Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) DISMISSING THIS CASE WITH PREJUDICE; AND (2) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE COURT’S DOCKET ______________________________________________________________________________
The Court, having been advised that the above-captioned matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to all parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Within sixty (60) days, the parties may move to substitute this Order and Entry with a proposed dismissal entry agreed upon by the parties. Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am.,
511 U.S. 375, 381-82(1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement, if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: October 18, 2019 s/ Michael J. Newman Michael J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown