Pursley v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Pursley v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JACOB A. PURSLEY, ) CASE NO. 1:19CV2459 ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO ) vs. ) ) ANDREW SAUL, ) ORDER Comm’r of Soc. Sec., ) ) Defendant. ) CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, J: On October 21, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Complaint pursuant to Title

42 U.S.C. § 405

(g). (Doc. 1). The Court referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. On June 2, 2020, the Magistrate Judge recommended vacating the Commissioner’s final decision and remanding for further consideration consistent with the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation. (Doc. 16). No party has filed an objection. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after service. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). No party has timely filed any such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that the parties are satisfied with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. Any further review by this Court would -1- be duplicative and an inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn,

728 F.2d 813

(6th Cir. 1984), aff’d

474 U.S. 140

(1985); Howard v. Sec’y of Health & Human Serv.,

932 F.2d 505

(6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters,

638 F.2d 947

(6th Cir. 1981). Therefore, Magistrate Judge Greenberg’s Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED,

the Commissioner’s final decision is VACATED and the case is REMANDED, pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 405

(g), for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Christopher A. Boyko CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO United States District Judge Dated: June 29, 2020

-2-

Reference

Status
Unknown