Jones v. Grimm
Jones v. Grimm
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Brandon Jones, Case No. 19cv1190 Plaintiff v. ORDER Corrections Officer Grimm, et al., Defendants. This is a civil rights case in which Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp II has filed a Report and Recommendation recommending that I grant defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 11). The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that any objections to the R&R were due within fourteen days after the filing of his R&R, which occurred on March 3, 2020. Because Jones did not file a timely objection, he forfeited his right to de novo review of the R&R. Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers Local 231,
829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). I need only “satisfy
[myself] that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Bogan v. Morgan,
2012 WL 3776514, *1 (N.D. Ohio 2012) (Gaughan, J.). Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s careful handling of Jones’s claim under
42 U.S.C. § 1983, I am satisfied that the R&R properly disposes of this case. It is, therefore, ORDERED THAT: The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12) be, and the same hereby is, adopted as the order of the court. So ordered. /s/ James G. Carr Sr. U.S. District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown