Fazio v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Fazio v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

MICHAEL J. FAZIO, ) CASE NO. 1:17-CV-842 ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE DONALD C. NUGENT Vv. ) ) ANDREW SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) AND ORDER Defendant. ) This case is before the Court on Plaintiff, Michael J. Fazio’s (“Mr. Fazio” or “Plaintiff’) Motion for Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 406

(b) of the Social Security Act (the “Act”) (ECF #29). Defendant, Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant’’) filed a Response to the Motion (ECF #30). Plaintiff's counsel, Attorney Paulette F. Balin (“Attorney Balin’), asks this Court to issue an Order awarding her $7,506.50 in attorney’s fees from the past- due benefits owed to Plaintiff pursuant to § 406(b) of the Act. Plaintiff's claim generated a total of $70,026.00 in past-due DAC benefits. (ECF #29). On September 20, 2018, Attorney Balin was granted Equal Access to Justice Act (““EAJA”) fees by stipulation of the parties in the amount of $6,413.24. (ECF #29). The Social Security Administration sent a Notice of Award dated June 15, 2020, notifying Plaintiff that twenty-five percent (25%) of his retroactive award is $17,506.50, and that this amount is being withheld from his benefits as attorney’s fees. Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Joseph Hajjar approved $10,000.00 in attorney’s fees pursuant

42 U.S.C. § 406

(a) for work performed before the administration in the matter. Specifically, ALJ Hajjar authorized a fee of $4,585.00 for Attorney Matthew J. Shupe and a fee of $5,415.00 for Attorney Paulette F. Balin.

Defendant filed a Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney’s Fees (ECF #30), indicating that he does not object to the fee request under § 406(b) and asks this Court to order Plaintiff's counsel to refund the EAJA award of $6,413.24 when received, as counsel is required to refund the claimant the lesser of the § 406(b) and EAJA awards. Pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 406

(b), the Court may award attorney’s fees to a successful claimant’s counsel for work performed before the Court in a reasonable amount, not to exceed 25% of the total past-due benefits. These fees are awarded from the past-due benefits awarded to the claimant and are withheld from the claimant by the Commissioner. See Gisbrecht v. Barnhart,

535 U.S. 789

(2002). The $7,506.50 fee requested under § 406(b) for services rendered only in federal court represents ten percent (10%) of the past-due SSDI benefits paid on Plaintiff's account. When combined with the $10,000.00 authorized in § 406(a) fees, the requested § 406(b) fees do not exceed 25% of the past-due benefits, as consistent with the fee agreement and the law. Accordingly, this Court finds that the amount of $7,506.50 in attorney’s fees is reasonable. THEREFORE, this Court authorizes a payment to Attorney Paulette F. Balin in the amount of $7,506.50 in attorney’s fees being withheld from Plaintiff's past-due benefits, and that upon receipt of this sum, Attorney Balin will remit $6,413.24 directly to Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED. all Mal fag Senior United States District-Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown