Rhodus v. Harris

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Rhodus v. Harris

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Michael J. Rhodus,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:18cv314

Chae Harris, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on December 17, 2019 (Doc. 24). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters,

638 F.2d 947

(6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 24) have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 24) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED entirely for want of prosecution, for lack of service and for failure to obey an Order of the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court

1

Reference

Status
Unknown