Bostick v. Commissioner of Social Security
Bostick v. Commissioner of Social Security
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
BECKY BOSTICK, : Case No. 1:16-cv-849 : Plaintiff, : Judge Timothy S. Black : vs. : Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz : COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL : SECURITY, : : Defendant. :
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES (Doc. 23)
This is a Social Security disability benefits appeal in which Plaintiff received Social Security disability benefits after this Court remanded the case for further proceedings. (Docs. 18, 23-2). On March 31, 2020, Plaintiff’s counsel filed a motion pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 406(b), seeking attorneys’ fees for services rendered in pursuit of Plaintiff’s past-due benefits (the “Motion for Attorneys’ Fees”). (Doc. 23). Then, on April 2, 2020, the Commissioner filed a response stating as follows: the Commissioner “has reviewed Plaintiff’s counsel’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees Pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 406(b) and does not object to the amount sought therein.” (Doc. 24). Under
42 U.S.C. § 406(b), an attorney who successfully represents a Social Security claimant may seek a reasonable fee for such representation, not in excess of 25 percent of the total past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled.
42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1); see Horenstein v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs.,
35 F.3d 261, 262(6th Cir. 1994). The Court must determine the reasonableness of the fees sought subject to the
statutory 25 percent cap. Gisbrecht v. Barnhart,
535 U.S. 789, 807(2002). Section 406(b) “does not displace contingent-fee agreements”; rather, it “calls for court review of such arrangements as an independent check, to assure that they yield reasonable results in particular cases.”
Id.Here, Plaintiff’s counsel seeks $10,000.00 pursuant to a 25 percent contingent-fee
agreement. (Doc. 23, 23-3). $10,000.00 represents far less than 25 percent of the past- due benefits Plaintiff received through her counsel’s representation. (Doc. 23 at 3; see Doc. 23-2). Upon review, the Court finds that the fee sought is reasonable in light of the many hours expended by Plaintiff’s counsel in pursuit of a favorable outcome for her client. (See Doc. 23-4).
Based upon the foregoing, Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. 23) is GRANTED, and the Commissioner is DIRECTED to pay Plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 406(b) in the amount of $10,000.00. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 4/7/2020 s/Timothy S. Black Timothy S. Black United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown