Sowards v. Tanisino

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Sowards v. Tanisino

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION โ€“ CINCINNATI

SEAN C. SOWARDS, : Case No. 1:20-cv-88 : Plaintiff, : Judge Matthew W. McFarland : v. : : JOSEPH TANISINO, et al., : : Defendants. : : ______________________________________________________________________________

ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 4) ______________________________________________________________________________ The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman (Doc. 4), to whom this case is referred pursuant to

28 U.S.C. ยง 636

(b). Noting that no objections have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, the Court hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations in its entirety. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 41(b). See also Link v. Wabash R.R.,

370 U.S. 626, 630-631

(1962); Jourdan v. Jabe,

951 F.2d 108, 109-10

(6th Cir. 1991) IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

By: /s/ Matthew W. McFarland JUDGE MATTHEW W. McFARLAND

Reference

Status
Unknown