Bronson v. Cincinnati Police Department

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Bronson v. Cincinnati Police Department

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Daniel Bronson,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20cv367

Cincinnati Police Department, Judge Michael R. Barrett

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on May 29, 2020 (Doc. 5). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters,

638 F.2d 947

(6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 5) have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 5) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff’s Complaint, as amended (see Docs. 1-1, 2, 4), is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §§ 1915

(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). This Court certifies pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3) an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore denies plaintiff leave to appeal in forma

1 pauperis. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth,

114 F.3d 601

(6th Cir. 1997). IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court

2

Reference

Status
Unknown