Bronson v. Issac

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Bronson v. Issac

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Daniel Bronson,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20cv461

Isaac Elliot, Judge Michael R. Barrett

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on June 19, 2020 (Doc. 5). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters,

638 F.2d 947

(6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 5) have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 5) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, the Complaint (Doc. 4) is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §§ 1915

(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1).

1 The Court certifies pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3) that an appeal of this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore the Court denies plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth,

114 F.3d 601

(6th Cir. 1997). IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court

2

Reference

Status
Unknown