Martin v. DeWine
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Tracy D. Martin, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:20cv481 Governor Mike DeWine, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett Defendants.
ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on June 29, 2020 (Doc. 4).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 4) have been filed.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 4) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, the plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 3) is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A(b), and 1367(c)(3).
The Court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), any appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore denies plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis.
See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 1997).
IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.