Byrd (Booker) v. Dandridge
Byrd (Booker) v. Dandridge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Brandon Manfrez Byrd (Booker),
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 1:20cv650
Sheriff Srgt. Drandridge, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett
Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on October 9, 2020 (Doc. 3). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters,
638 F.2d 947(6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 3) have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 3) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, more than 30 days has elapsed. Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s order to pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The matter is closed and terminated from the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court
1
Reference
- Status
- Unknown