Strickland v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Strickland v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Tonia Strickland, Case No. 3:20-cv-1412

Plaintiff

v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

Before me is the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz filed on August 6, 2021. (Doc. No. 18). Under the relevant statute: Within [fourteen (14)] days after being served a copy of these proposed Findings and Recommendation, any party who wishes to object must file and serve written objections or further appeal is waived.

United States v. Campbell,

261 F.3d 628, 631-32

(6th Cir. 2001) (citation omitted); see also

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) (effective Dec. 1, 2009); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). In this case, the fourteen-day window for objections has elapsed, and no objections have been filed. Following review of Judge Ruiz’s R & R, I adopt it in its entirety as the Order of the Court. Therefore, the Commissioner’s decision is affirmed, and this case is dismissed.

So Ordered. s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown