Strickland v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Strickland v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Tonia Strickland, Case No. 3:20-cv-1412
Plaintiff
v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant
Before me is the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz filed on August 6, 2021. (Doc. No. 18). Under the relevant statute: Within [fourteen (14)] days after being served a copy of these proposed Findings and Recommendation, any party who wishes to object must file and serve written objections or further appeal is waived.
United States v. Campbell,
261 F.3d 628, 631-32(6th Cir. 2001) (citation omitted); see also
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (effective Dec. 1, 2009); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). In this case, the fourteen-day window for objections has elapsed, and no objections have been filed. Following review of Judge Ruiz’s R & R, I adopt it in its entirety as the Order of the Court. Therefore, the Commissioner’s decision is affirmed, and this case is dismissed.
So Ordered. s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown