Allen v. Haviland
Allen v. Haviland
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Terenzo D. Allen, Case No. 3:18 CV 2839
Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -vs- JUDGE JACK ZOUHARY Warden James Haviland,
Respondent.
Petitioner Terenzo Allen seeks a Writ of Habeas Corpus under
28 U.S.C. § 2254(Doc. 1). On October 22, 2021, Magistrate Judge Carmen Henderson issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending this Court dismiss the Petition (Doc. 11 at 43). Although this Court reviews de novo any portions of an R&R to which a party timely objects under
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), failure to timely object waives district and appellate court review of the R&R. See Miller v. Currie,
50 F.3d 373, 380(6th Cir. 1995); United States v. Walters,
638 F.2d 947, 950(6th Cir. 1981). The R&R notified Allen that failure to object would result in waiver (Doc. 11 at 43). See Walters,
638 F.2d at 950. Allen has not objected, and the deadline for objections has passed. This Court therefore adopts the R&R (Doc. 11) in its entirety. The Petition (Doc. 1) is dismissed. There is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. See
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Further, an appeal from this Order could not be taken in good faith. See
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Jack Zouhary JACK ZOUHARY U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE
November 30, 2021
Reference
- Status
- Unknown