Fisher v. Samson Tube, LLC
Fisher v. Samson Tube, LLC
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
DENNIS FISHER,
Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:20-cv-351
vs.
SAMSON TUBE, LLC, District Judge Michael J. Newman
Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER: PROVIDING COUNSEL 10 DAYS TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF THEIR JOINT MOTION FOR A FLSA SETTLEMENT (DOC. NO. 13) ______________________________________________________________________________
This civil case came before the Court for a status conference on April 13, 2021 at 3:00 p.m. Attorneys Bradley Gibson and Christopher Dubes were present. The parties advised the Court that they recently filed joint motion for a settlement agreement. Doc. No. 13. In reviewing a proposed FLSA settlement, “a court must scrutinize the proposed settlement for fairness and determine whether the settlement is a ‘fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute over FLSA provisions.’” Snook v. Valley OB-GYN Clinic, P.C., No. 14-CV-12303,
2014 WL 7369904, at *2 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 29, 2014) (quoting Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. United States,
679 F.2d 1350, 1354 (11th Cir. 1982)). “Courts should consider the following factors in determining whether a proposed FLSA settlement is fair and reasonable: (1) the existence of fraud or collusion behind the settlement; (2) the complexity, expense, and likely duration of the litigation; (3) the stage of the proceedings and the amount of discovery completed; (4) the probability of plaintiff's success on the merits; (5) the range of possible recovery; and (6) the opinions of the counsel.” Snook,
2014 WL 7369904, at *2 (citing Dees v. Hydradry, Inc.,
706 F. Supp. 2d 1227, 1241(M.D. Fla. 2010)). In addition, courts must remain cognizant of confidentiality provisions in FLSA settlements. Chime v. Fam. Life Counseling & Psychiatric Servs., No. 1:19CV2513,
2020 WL 6746511, at *4 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 17, 2020). The Court is obligated to ensure that the parties’ proposed settlement agreement is in
compliance with the requirements set forth above. For these reasons, the Court will provide counsel with 10 days in which to file supplemental briefing to make their arguments regarding these factors.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: April 14, 2021 s/Michael J. Newman Hon. Michael J. Newman United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown