Howard v. City Hall
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI
CHYRIE HOWARD, é Case No, 1:21-cv-159
Plaintiff, : Judge Matthew W. McFarland : Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz vs. :
CITY HALL,
Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 4)
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz (Doc. 4), to whom this case is referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). No objections have been filed. The time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired. The Court thus ADOPTS the Report in its entirety, CERTIFIES pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that, for the reasons expressed in the Report, an appeal of this Order adopting the Report would not be taken in good faith, and therefore DENIES plaintiffs leave to appeal im forma pauperis. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 611 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds, Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 203 (2007). Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 1999). This action is hereby TERMINATED on the Court's docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO By: □
JUDGE MATTHEW W. McFARLAND
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.