Smith v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
Smith v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Kent Smith,
Petitioner,
vs. Case No. 1:20-cv-00994
Warden, London Correctional Institution, Judge Michael R. Barrett
Respondent.
ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's August 9, 2021 Report and Recommendation ("R&R"). (Doc. 12). Proper notice has been given to the parties under
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. (Doc. 12 PageID 46); United States v. Walters,
638 F.2d 947(6th Cir. 1981). Although objections were due to the Court by August 23, 2021, none have been filed. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 12) is ADOPTED in full. Consistent with the recommendations by the Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that (1) Petitioner's pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice as premature; (2) Petitioner’s motion to stay the matter (Doc. 3) is DENIED as moot; (3) a certificate of appealability will not issue because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right that is remediable at this juncture in this proceeding; and (4) the Court certifies that, with respect to any application by petitioner to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, an appeal of this Order adopting the R&R would not be taken in good faith, and Petitioner is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. IT IS SO ORDERED. _/s Michael R. Barrett____________ Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court
Reference
- Status
- Unknown