SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

SHIRLEY YOUNG, : Case No. 3:21-cv-48 : Plaintiff, : : District Judge Michael J. Newman vs. : Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr. : COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL : SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, : : Defendant. : REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS1

This matter is before the Court following pro se Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s Order to file a statement of errors or show good cause why her claim should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Doc. #10). In the Court’s most recent Order, Plaintiff was advised that her failure to show cause on or before October 12, 2021 could result in the dismissal of this case for failure to prosecute. Id. Despite this warning, Plaintiff has failed to file her statement of errors or show good cause for her failure to do so. As a result of these failures, the undersigned concludes that dismissal for failure to prosecute is appropriate. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also Link v. Wabash R.R. Co.,

(1962). IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. The case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute; and

2. The case be terminated on the Court’s docket.

October 18, 2021 s/Peter B. Silvain, Jr. Peter B. Silvain, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), any party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within FOURTEEN days after being served with this Report and Recommendations. Such objections shall specify the portions of the Report objected to and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Report and Recommendations is based in whole or in part upon matters occurring of record at an oral hearing, the objecting party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or such portions of it as all parties may agree upon or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the assigned District Judge otherwise directs. A party may respond to another party’s objections within FOURTEEN days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn,

(1985); United States v. Walters,

(6th Cir. 1981).