Sickinger v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Sickinger v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER ALLEN SICKINGER, ) CASE NO. 1:21CV327 ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS ) -vs- ) ) MEMORANDUM OF OPINION COMMISSIONER ) AND ORDER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. )

On February 24, 2022, the Magistrate Judge in this matter submitted a report and recommendation (Doc. 18) recommending that the Court AFFIRM the Commissioner’s decision. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation within fourteen (14) days after service. Plaintiff has filed notice that he will not object to the R&R. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn,

728 F.2d 813

(6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs.,

932 F.2d 505

(6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters,

638 F.2d 947, 949-50

(6th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted. The decision of the Commissioner is hereby AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 9, 2022 /s/ John R. Adams_______________ JOHN R. ADAMS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown