Hayden v. Commissioner of Social Security
Hayden v. Commissioner of Social Security
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
David Hayden, Case No. 3:20-cv-2263
Plaintiff
v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant
Before me is the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson filed on December 1, 2021. (Doc. No. 19). Under the relevant statute: Within [fourteen (14)] days after being served a copy of these proposed Findings and Recommendation, any party who wishes to object must file and serve written objections or further appeal is waived.
United States v. Campbell,
261 F.3d 628, 631-32(6th Cir. 2001) (citation omitted); see also
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (effective Dec. 1, 2009); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). In this case, the fourteen-day window for objections has elapsed, and no objections have been filed. Following review of Judge Henderson’s R & R, I adopt it in its entirety as the Order of the Court. I agree with Judge Henderson’s conclusion that the ALJ properly evaluated Plaintiff’s testimony regarding his symptoms as well as the opinion of Plaintiff’s treating physician Linda Speer, M.D. Therefore, the Commissioner’s decision is affirmed, and this case is dismissed. So Ordered. s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown