Campbell Basquez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Campbell Basquez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Alma Marie Campbell Basquez, Case No. 3:21-cv-1777
Plaintiff,
v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
Before me is the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson filed on July 20, 2022. (Doc. No. 14). Under the relevant statute: Within [fourteen (14)] days after being served a copy of these proposed Findings and Recommendation, any party who wishes to object must file and serve written objections or further appeal is waived.
United States v. Campbell,
261 F.3d 628, 631-32(6th Cir. 2001) (citation omitted); see also
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (effective Dec. 1, 2009); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). In this case, the fourteen-day window for objections has elapsed, and no objections have been filed. Following review of Judge Henderson’s R & R, I adopt it in its entirety as the Order of the Court. Judge Henderson correctly concluded that the ALJ considered the proper evidence when assessing Plaintiff’s migraines. Further, I agree the ALJ’s residual functional capacity (“RFC”) determination is supported by substantial evidence. Therefore, I affirm the Commissioner’s decision, as recommended by Judge Henderson. So Ordered. s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown