King v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
King v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
KARL L. KING, ) CASE NO. 1:22-CV-00713 ) Petitioner, ) SENIOR JUDGE ) CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO vs. ) ) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ) OPINION AND ORDER et al., ) ) Respondents. )
CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, SR. J.:
This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5) pertaining to Petitioner’s Motion to Dismiss Case without Prejudice and Motion for Required Information. (Doc. 4.) The Report and Recommendation recommends the dismissal of his petition and deny his request for legal forms. Objections to the Supplemental Report and Recommendation were due by October 3, 2022. Neither party has filed an objection. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Both parties have failed to timely file any such objection. Therefore, the Court must assume that the parties are satisfied with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be duplicative and an inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 140, 155(1985); United States v. Walters,
638 F.2d 947, 949-50(6th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Supplemental Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 5); GRANTS IN PART Defendant’s Motion as to dismiss his petition (Doc. 4) and DENIES Defendant’s requests legal forms.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s Christopher A. Boyko CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO Senior United States District Judge
Dated: November 17, 2022
Reference
- Status
- Unknown