Rogers v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Rogers v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Allen Rogers, : Petitioner : Case Number: 1:20cv203 VS. : : Judge Susan J. Dlott Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution : Respondent ORDER The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge filed on August 23, 2021(Doc. 9), to whom this case was referred pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §636

(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired September 7, 2021, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

is DENIED. A certificate of appealability does not issue with respect to the claims alleged in the petition, which have been addressed on the merits herein, because petitioner has not stated a “viable claim of the denial of a constitutional right,” nor are the issues presented “adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” See Slack v. McDaniel,

529 U.S. 473, 475

(2000) (citing Barefoot v. Estelle,

463 U.S. 880

, 893 & n.4 (1983)). See also

28 U.S.C. § 2253

(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). With respect to any application by petitioner to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis,

the Court certifies pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3) that an appeal of this Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in “good faith,” and, therefore DENIES petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis upon a showing of financial necessity. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a); Kincade v. Sparkman,

117 F.3d 949, 952

(6th Cir. 1997). This case is hereby TERMINATED upon the Court’s docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Judge Susan J. Dlot United States District'Court

Reference

Status
Unknown