Rogers v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Rogers v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Allen Rogers, : Petitioner : Case Number: 1:20cv203 VS. : : Judge Susan J. Dlott Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution : Respondent ORDER The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge filed on August 23, 2021(Doc. 9), to whom this case was referred pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired September 7, 2021, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2254is DENIED. A certificate of appealability does not issue with respect to the claims alleged in the petition, which have been addressed on the merits herein, because petitioner has not stated a “viable claim of the denial of a constitutional right,” nor are the issues presented “adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” See Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 475(2000) (citing Barefoot v. Estelle,
463 U.S. 880, 893 & n.4 (1983)). See also
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). With respect to any application by petitioner to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis,
the Court certifies pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in “good faith,” and, therefore DENIES petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis upon a showing of financial necessity. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a); Kincade v. Sparkman,
117 F.3d 949, 952(6th Cir. 1997). This case is hereby TERMINATED upon the Court’s docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Judge Susan J. Dlot United States District'Court
Reference
- Status
- Unknown