Queen v. Commissioner of Social Security
Queen v. Commissioner of Social Security
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON LAANA Q., : Case No. 3:20-cv-00059 Plaintiff, : : Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington VS. : (by full consent of the parties) COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL: SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, : Defendant. :
DECISION AND ENTRY
This case is before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees Under Equal Access to Justice Act,
28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (Doc. No. 15). The Commissioner filed a response (Doc. No. 16) indicating that it does not oppose Plaintiffs request. Plaintiff seeks an award of attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of $3,616.00. In the absence of opposition by the Commissioner, Plaintiff's Motion and supporting documents establish that she is entitled to an award of attorney fees under the EAJA in the total amount she seeks. The attorney fees awarded under the EAJA belong to Plaintiff and are subject to administrative “offset if [she] has outstanding federal debts.” Astrue v. Ratliff,
560 U.S. 586, 594(2010). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees Under Equal Access to Justice Act,
28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (Doc. No. 15) is GRANTED;
2. The Commissioner shall pay Plaintiffs attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of $3,616.00 and $0.00 in costs; 3. The Commissioner shall verify, within thirty days of this Decision and Entry, whether or not Plaintiff owes a pre-existing debt to the United States subject to offset. If no such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiff's counsel; and 4. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.
February 4, 2022 s/Sharon L. Ovington Sharon L. Ovington United States Magistrate Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown