District Court, S.D. Ohio, 2022

Bunch v. Commissioner of Social Security

Bunch v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, S.D. Ohio · Decided March 4, 2022
Bunch v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION NICOLA C. B.,! ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) Civil Action No. 3:21-cv-00055 v. ) ) Magistrate Judge Silvain KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER This cause coming before the Court on the joint motion of the parties, due notice having been given, and the Court being fully advised, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The Parties’ Joint Stipulation for an Award of Attorney's Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act is accepted and the Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff's attorney fees in the amount of $3,100.00 and costs in the amount of $0, for a total award of $3,100.00; 2. Counsel for the parties shall verify whether or not Plaintiff owes a preexisting debt to the United States subject to offset, consistent with Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). If no such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiffs counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment signed by Plaintiff; and 3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

March 4, 2022 s/Peter B. Silvain, Jr. Peter B. Silvain, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge ! The Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States hac reranmmended that Ane ta cianificant nrrvarcty canrernc in carial cearimity raced faderal eanrte chanuld refar ta

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.