Folley v. Foley
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
DEREK FOLLEY, Petitioner, : Case No. 3:22-cv-065 - vs - District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz KEITH J. FOLEY, Warden, : Respondent.
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING This habeas corpus case, brought pro se by Petitioner Derek Folley under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is before the Court on Folley’s Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing on his Speedy Trial claim (ECF No. 94). The Motion is denied on the authority of Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S. 170 (2011), and Shinn v. Martinez Ramirez, 596 U.S. ___, 142 S.Ct. 1718 (2022).
July 15, 2022. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.