Warman v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
Warman v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Ryan J. Warman,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 1:20cv291
Jenny Hildebrand, Warden, Judge Michael R. Barrett London Correctional Institution,
Respondent.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on September 7, 2022 (Doc. 22). Proper notice has been given to the parties under
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties may forfeit rights on appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters,
638 F.2d 947(6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. 22) have been filed and the time to do so has expired. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 22) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, the petition is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and judgment shall be entered in favor of respondent and against petitioner. Because petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right,
28 U.S.C. § 2254(c)(3), and no reasonable jurist would disagree would this conclusion, petitioner is denied a certificate
1 of appealability and should not be permitted to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court
2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown