UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE: DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, Case No. 2:18-md-2846 INC., POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA

MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson

This document relates to:

Kilgore v. Davol, Inc. et al.

Case No. 2:21-cv-3331

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Substitute Party. (ECF No. 5.) Rule 25 provides that, “[i]f a party dies and the claim is not extinguished, the court may order substitution of the proper party.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). “A motion for substitution may be made by any party or by the decedent’s successor or representative.” Id. Plaintiff Loraine Kilgore passed away on July 9, 2018. (ECF No. 5.) Ms. Kilgore’s son, Christopher Simpson, is the surviving next of kin. (Id.) Plaintiff now moves for the substitution of Mr. Simpson as the proper plaintiff. (Id.) Plaintiff filed a supplement to the Motion explaining that Mr. Simpson is Ms. Kilgore’s sole heir under Georgia law. (ECF No. 7.) However, under Georgia law, in the case of the death of a plaintiff, a cause of action “shall survive to the personal representative of the deceased plaintiff.” O.C.G.A. § 9-2-41 (emphasis added). A decedent’s tort claim “may be pursued by the estate’s personal representative, but not by heirs or a devisee under [a] will.” Matter of Harman,

, 659 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2020), reconsideration denied, No. AP 11-05534-LRC,

(Bankr. N.D. Ga. Feb. 24, 2021). Because neither the Motion nor the supplement has made any allegation that Mr. Simpson is a representative of Ms. Kilgore’s estate, and an heir is not entitled to pursue a decedent’s tort claim under Georgia law, Plaintiff’s Motion to Substitute (ECF No. 5) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

11/14/2022 s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. DATE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE