UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Kwame Dadzie, Case No. 3:21-cv-1989

Plaintiff,

v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Commissioner of Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

Before me is the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay filed on September 30, 2022. (Doc. No. 15). Under the relevant statute: Within [fourteen (14)] days after being served a copy of these proposed Findings and Recommendation, any party who wishes to object must file and serve written objections or further appeal is waived.

United States v. Campbell,

(6th Cir. 2001) (citation omitted); see also

(b)(1) (effective Dec. 1, 2009); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). In this case, the fourteen-day window for objections has elapsed, and no objections have been filed. Following review of Judge Clay’s R & R, I adopt it in its entirety as the Order of the Court. I agree that the ALJ appropriately concluded Plaintiff’s impairments did not meet Listings 12.04, 12.06, or 12.15. I also agree that the ALJ’s residual functional capacity (“RFC”) assessment is supported by substantial evidence. Finally, I find Judge Clay correctly concluded Plaintiff is not entitled to remand under Sentence Six here. Therefore, I affirm the ALJ’s decision, as recommended by Judge Clay, and close this case. So Ordered. s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick United States District Judge