Speidell v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Speidell v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Nancy Sue Speidell, Case No. 3:21-cv-2284

Plaintiff,

v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

Before me is the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson filed on September 16, 2022. (Doc. No. 10). Under the relevant statute: Within [fourteen (14)] days after being served a copy of these proposed Findings and Recommendation, any party who wishes to object must file and serve written objections or further appeal is waived.

United States v. Campbell,

261 F.3d 628, 631-32

(6th Cir. 2001) (citation omitted); see also

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) (effective Dec. 1, 2009); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). In this case, the fourteen-day window for objections has elapsed, and no objections have been filed. Following review of Judge Henderson’s R & R, I adopt it in its entirety as the Order of the Court. I agree that the ALJ’s findings are supported by substantial evidence in the record. Further, Judge Henderson correctly concluded that the post-hearing evidence does not require remand in this case. Therefore, I affirm the ALJ’s decision, as recommended by Judge Henderson, and close this case. So Ordered. s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown