Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Case No. 3:23-cv-01069-JJH ) v. ) ) JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP ) Address 104.49.187.32, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENA PRIOR TO A RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Serve a Third-Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference (the “Motion”), and the Court being duly advised in the premises does hereby: FIND, ORDER AND ADJUDGE: 1. Plaintiff established that “good cause” exists for it to serve a third-party subpoena on AT&T Internet (hereinafter the “ISP”). See Cook Prods., LLC v. Does 1-10, No. 16-3045,
2016 WL 10489867, at *1 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 30, 2016); Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe,
964 F.3d 1203, 1207(D.C. Cir. 2020). 2. Plaintiff may serve the ISP with a Rule 45 subpoena commanding the ISP to provide Plaintiff with the true name and address of the Defendant to whom the ISP assigned an IP address as set forth in the Complaint. Plaintiff shall attach to any such subpoena a copy of this Order. 3. If the ISP qualifies as a “cable operator,” as defined by
47 U.S.C. § 522(5), which states: the term “cable operator” means any person or group of persons (A) who provides cable service over a cable system and directly or through one or more affiliates owns a significant interest in such cable system, or (B) who otherwise controls or is responsible for, through any arrangement, the management and operation of such a cable system. it shall comply with
47 U.S.C. § 551(c)(2)(B), which states: A cable operator may disclose such [personal identifying] information if the disclosure is . . . made pursuant to a court order authorizing such disclosure, if the subscriber is notified of such order by the person to whom the order is directed. by sending a copy of this Order to the Defendant. 4. Plaintiff may only use the information disclosed in response to a Rule 45 subpoena served on the ISP for the purpose of protecting and enforcing Plaintiff’s rights as set forth in its Complaint. DONE AND ORDERED this _2_0_ day of ___J_u_n_e__________, 202_3_. By: __s_/_ J_e_f_fr_e_y_ J_._ H_e_l_m_i_c_k__________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown