Tyson v. Jackson-Mitchell

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Tyson v. Jackson-Mitchell

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

DURAN TYSON, JR., ) CASE NO.: 3:22-cv-00339 ) Petitioner, ) JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS ) v. ) ) WARDEN WANZA JACKSON- ) ORDER MITCHELL, ) ) Respondent. )

This matter came before the Court on Petitioner’s Petition Under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (the “Petition”). Doc. 1. This Court referred the matter to the Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge submitted a report and recommendation, recommending that the Court deny the petition. Doc. 13. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation within 14 days after service. Petitioner did not file an objection to the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn,

728 F.2d 813

(6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs.,

932 F.2d 505

(6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters,

638 F.2d 947, 949-50

(6th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted. The Petition is DISMISSED.

(REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) The Court certifies, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

November 16, 2023 /s/ Judge John R. Adams Date JOHN R. ADAMS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown