IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI MONTEZ J. BUSH, : Case No. 1:23-cv-226 Plaintiff, Judge Matthew W. McFarland CINCINNATI RESTORATION INC.,, et al., : Defendants.

ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 4) The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz (Doc. 4), to whom this case is referred pursuant to

(b). Plaintiff timely filed Objections (Doc. 5) in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). However, Plaintiff's objections are “vague, general, [and] conclusory” and, consequently, fail to “meet the requirement of specific.” Cole v. Yukins,

(6th Cir. 2001). Thus, such objections are “tantamount to a complete failure to object.” See

Therefore, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. 5) and hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the following: 1. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to

(e)(2)(B); 2. The Court CERIFIES pursuant to

(a) that, for the reasons

explained in the Report and Recommendation, an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore DENIES Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. See Callihan v. Schneider,

(6th Cir. 1999), overruling in part Floyd v. U.S. Postal Serv.,

(6th Cir. 1997); and 3. This matter is TERMINATED from the Court’s docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Wath, wold ¢ By: JUDGE MATTHEW W. McFARLAND