District Court, S.D. Ohio, 2023

Hogan v. House Holder

Hogan v. House Holder
District Court, S.D. Ohio · Decided October 24, 2023
Hogan v. House Holder

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION (COLUMBUS) TREMAIN HOGAN, : Case No. 2:22-cv-03741 : Plaintiff, : District Judge James L. Graham : Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry vs. : : RYAN HOUSEHOLDER, et al., : Defendants. :

ORDER This matter is before the Court upon sua sponte review. Several recent filings have been returned undelivered from Plaintiff’s address of record, and public records maintained by the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections indicate that Plaintiff may currently be incarcerated.

Accordingly, out of an abundance of caution, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send copies of Documents No. 25 and 26 and the Court’s September 20 Notation Order to Plaintiff at the following address: Toledo Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 80033, Toledo, Ohio 43608. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to send copies of the instant Order both to the foregoing address and to Plaintiff’s current address of record.

Plaintiff is CAUTIONED that he must keep the Court apprised of his address at all times, including following release or any transfers while in custody. If Plaintiff fails to update his address with the Court, his case may be dismissed for lack of prosecution.

IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Caroline H. Gentry Caroline H. Gentry United States Magistrate Judge Procedure on Objections Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), any party may serve and file specific, written objections within FOURTEEN days after being served with this Order. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d), this period is extended to SEVENTEEN days if this Order is being served by one of the methods of service listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(C), (D), or (F). Such objections shall specify the portions of the Order objected to and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Order is based in whole or in part upon matters occurring of record at an oral hearing, the objecting party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or such portions of it as all parties may agree upon or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the assigned District Judge otherwise directs. A party may respond to another party’s objections within FOURTEEN days after being served with a copy thereof.

Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.