Singleton v. Warren Correctional Institution
Singleton v. Warren Correctional Institution
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Travis Singleton,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 1:23cv550
Warren Correctional Institution,
Defendant.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on October 17, 2023 (Doc. 3). Proper notice has been given to the parties under
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties may forfeit rights on appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters,
638 F.2d 947(6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. 3) have been filed and the time to do so has expired. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 3) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and will not be reinstated to the Court’s active docket despite payment of the filing fee. In re Prison Litigation Reform Act,
105 F.3d 1131. The Court certifies pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that for the reasons stated in the R&R (Doc. 3) an appeal of this Court’s Order would not be taken in good faith. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth,
114 F.3d 601(6th Cir. 1997).
1 IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court
2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown