Miller v. Hudson
Miller v. Hudson
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
John Holsen Miller,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 1:24cv401
George Hudson,
Defendant.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on August 5, 2024 (Doc. 5). Proper notice has been given to the parties under
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties may forfeit rights on appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters,
638 F.2d 947(6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. 5) have been filed and the time to do so has expired. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 5) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, the complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court
1
Reference
- Status
- Unknown