Cooley v. Sunoco LLC
Cooley v. Sunoco LLC
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
CHRISTOPHER COOLEY, : : Plaintiff, : Case No. 1:23-cv-80 : vs. : Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins : SUNOCO, LLC, et al., : : Defendants. :
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 37) issued by Chief Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on November 14, 2024. The Magistrate Judge recommends that this Court grant the Joint Motion (Doc. 36) filed by Plaintiff and the Sunoco Defendants, and thereby dismiss the Sunoco Defendants with prejudice. No objections have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired. Having carefully reviewed the comprehensive findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and finding no clear error, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (advisory committee notes) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the fact of the record in order to accept the recommendation”); see e.g., Roane v. Warden of Corr. Reception Ctr., No. 2:22-cv-2768,
2022 WL 16535903, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 28, 2022). Accordingly, the Sunoco Defendants are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. As a result, Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Doc. 30) is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 18, 2024 on. Kffery/P. Hopkihs United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown