Cunningham v. Bender

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Cunningham v. Bender

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI CAROL YVONNE CUNNINGHAM, : Case No. 1:24-cv-607 Plaintiff, 2 Judge Matthew W. McFarland : Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz v. EMILY BENDER, Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 4)

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz (Doc. 4), to whom this case is referred. Noting that no objections have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, the Court hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the following: 1. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice as to any federal claims pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B). 2. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice to any state law claims to be filed in state court. 3. The Court certifies pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a), that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of this Order adopting the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4) would not be taken in good faith and

therefore denies Ms. Cunningham leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Ms. Cunningham remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. See Callihan v. Schneider,

178 F.3d 800, 803

(6th Cir. 1999), overruling in part Floyd v. United 5 States Postal Serv.,

105 F.3d 274, 277

(6th Cir. 1997). IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WAY; 4 ae By: JUDGE MATTHEW W. McFARLAND

Reference

Status
Unknown