Renfrow v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Renfrow v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Michelle Renfrow, Case No. 3:24-cv-946
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER AND JUDGEMENT ENTRY
Commissioner of Social Security Administration,
Defendant.
On December 18, 2024, United States Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg issued a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending I vacate the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision denying Plaintiff’s applications for a Period of Disability, Disability Insurance Benefits, and Supplemental Security Income and remand this matter for further proceedings consistent with his R & R. (Doc. No. 12). In the R & R, he notified the parties: Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Courts within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this document. Failure to file objections within the specified time may forfeit the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Berkshire v. Beauvais,
928 F.3d 520, 530-31(6th Cir. 2019).
(Id. at 17). More than fourteen days passed, and no party filed any objection to the R & R. I consider their failure to file objections to “constitute a waiver of subsequent review,” Local R. 72.3(b), and adopt Judge Greenberg’s R & R in its entirety as the final Order of this Court. The Commissioner’s decision is vacated, and this matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with Judge Greenberg’s R & R. Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion asking that I enter judgment so he may file a motion for attorney fees is denied as moot. (Doc. No. 13).
So Ordered. s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown