Timm v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Timm v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Gary Timm, Jr.,
Petitioner, Case No. 2:24-cv-353 Judge James L. Graham v. Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution,
Respondent.
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, which recommended that petitioner’s habeas corpus petition brought under
28 U.S.C. § 2254be denied with prejudice. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. Upon review, the Court agrees with the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11), which is hereby adopted. The petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Court finds that a certificate of appealability should not issue with respect to the petition because petitioner has not stated a “viable claim of the denial of a constitutional right” or presented an issue that is “adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” See Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 475(2000); see also
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). The Court certifies pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this order would not be taken in good faith for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the Court denies petitioner leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a); Kincade v. Sparkman,
117 F.3d 949, 952(6th Cir. 1997).
s/ James L. Graham JAMES L. GRAHAM United States District Judge
DATE: June 11, 2025
Reference
- Status
- Unknown