Timm v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Timm v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Gary Timm, Jr.,

Petitioner, Case No. 2:24-cv-353 Judge James L. Graham v. Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

Warden, Noble Correctional Institution,

Respondent.

Order Adopting Report and Recommendation

This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, which recommended that petitioner’s habeas corpus petition brought under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

be denied with prejudice. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. Upon review, the Court agrees with the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11), which is hereby adopted. The petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Court finds that a certificate of appealability should not issue with respect to the petition because petitioner has not stated a “viable claim of the denial of a constitutional right” or presented an issue that is “adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” See Slack v. McDaniel,

529 U.S. 473, 475

(2000); see also

28 U.S.C. § 2253

(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). The Court certifies pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §1915

(a)(3) that an appeal of this order would not be taken in good faith for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the Court denies petitioner leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a); Kincade v. Sparkman,

117 F.3d 949, 952

(6th Cir. 1997).

s/ James L. Graham JAMES L. GRAHAM United States District Judge

DATE: June 11, 2025

Reference

Status
Unknown