Heid v. Warden, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Heid v. Warden, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

JAMES DAMRON, : : Plaintiff, : Case No. 1:25-cv-107 : vs. : Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins : WARDEN, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF : REHABILITATION AND : CORRECTIONS, et al., : Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11) issued by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers on May 22, 2025. In that Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that, at this juncture, this matter may proceed on Plaintiff’s claims under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

. No objections have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired. Having carefully reviewed the comprehensive findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and finding no clear error, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (advisory committee notes from 1983 amendment) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation”); see e.g., Roane v. Warden of Corr. Reception Ctr., No. 2:22-cv-2768,

2022 WL 16535903

, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 28, 2022). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s § 1983 claims may proceed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 16, 2025 onUWOffeg7 P. Hopkin United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown