Brown v. Wieder
Brown v. Wieder
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
DAQUAN BROWN, : : Plaintiff, : Case No. 1:24-cv-416 : vs. : Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins : MICHAEL WIEDER, et al., : : Defendants. :
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation issued by Chief Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on August 20, 2024. Doc. 4. Having performed an initial screen of Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint in its entirety for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Complaint and the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired. Having carefully reviewed the comprehensive findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and finding no clear error, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (advisory committee notes from 1983 amendment) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation”); see e.g., Roane v. Warden of Corr. Reception Ctr., No. 2:22-cv-2768,
2022 WL 16535903, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 28, 2022). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 6, 2025 Horr Wefféfy P. Hopkins United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown